Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!pnet01!pro-amber.cts.com!rsopicki
From: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com (System Administrator)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Apple ][ BBS Software
Message-ID: <1991Jun17.015609.682@crash.cts.com>
Date: 17 Jun 91 01:56:09 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA
Lines: 14

In-Reply-To: message from greg@hoss.unl.edu

Gee guys! There is nothing wrong with running a bbs on 5 1/4 drives. I did
it myself before I bought my hard drive. I ran an AppleNet system on 4 51/4
inch drives and a Ram disk. I bought a hard drive and upgraded to proline.
My big problem on the small system was monitoring disk space. The hard
drive eliminates that to some extent. I guess what I'm trying to say is
there ain't nothing wrong with a small bbs. What ever suits you and your
users is ok!
----
ProLine:  rsopicki@pro-amber
Internet: rsopicki@pro-amber.cts.com
UUCP:     crash!pro-amber!rsopicki
ARPA:     crash!pro-amber!rsopicki@nosc.mil