Xref: utzoo comp.sys.atari.st.tech:2748 comp.sys.atari.st:39269 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!corton!laas!ralph From: ralph@laas.fr (Ralph P. Sobek) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st.tech,comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re: Review of LHARC Test Archive Function Message-ID: Date: 19 Jun 91 09:06:12 GMT References: <3545@laura.UUCP> Sender: news@laas.laas.fr Distribution: comp Organization: LAAS-CNRS France Lines: 30 In-reply-to: klute@tommy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de's message of 19 Jun 91 07:16:31 GMT In article <3545@laura.UUCP> klute@tommy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Rainer Klute) writes: | Your test still leaves open the question if the tested LHarcs are | compatible to one or more Unix LHarcs. I use xlharc that was posted to USENET. It works *very* well, since I test all the archives before bringing them to my Mega 4 ST. I then retest them on my Atari to be sure that all is fine. Its reference is the following: C-LHarc for Usage: %s {axevlufdmctp}[qnftv] archive_file [files or directories...] Version 1.00 (C) 1989-1990 Y.Tagawa, Kai Uwe Rommel The original Unix lharc had problems for uncompressed file members, a common problem for many of the ST lharc versions that abound. Someone locally patched the initial Unix lharc. Its reference is: C-LHarc for UNIX Version 1.00 (C) 1989-1990 Y.Tagawa, Kai Uwe Rommel Unfortunately, they are virtually indistinguishable. Xlharc was posted to the net by B. Davidsen. Hope that this helps further. -- Ralph P. Sobek Disclaimer: The above ruminations are my own. ralph@laas.fr Addresses are ordered by importance. ralph@laas.uucp, or ...!uunet!laas!ralph If all else fails, try: sobek@eclair.Berkeley.EDU =============================================================================== Proud owner of a Mega 4 ST. Wishing it was a Mega STe! :-|