Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!ariel!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!luga!lure.latrobe.edu.au!lhccjeh
From: lhccjeh@lure.latrobe.edu.au (James Hale)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: TicksCount
Message-ID: <1991Jun17.193130.1@lure.latrobe.edu.au>
Date: 17 Jun 91 09:31:30 GMT
References: <0B01FFFB.hrywuc@outpost.UUCP>
Sender: news@luga.latrobe.edu.au (USENET News System)
Organization: VAX Cluster, Computer Centre, La Trobe University
Lines: 26

In article <0B01FFFB.hrywuc@outpost.UUCP>, peirce@outpost.UUCP (Michael Peirce) writes:
> 
> In article <5721@hemuli.tik.vtt.fi>, aku@tik.vtt.fi (Arto Kujala) writes:
>> 
>> 
>> Is there a way to get more accurate time than function TickCount
>> gives?
>> 
>> 1/100 sec precision would be appropriate.
> 
> Check out the latest Time Manager (known as the extended Time Manager
> and documented in Inside Mac VI).  It provides for accuracy of up
> to 20 milliseconds drift free.
> 
> -- michael peirce

One tick is 1/60 of a second or 16.67 msec. 
a 20 msec accuracy is not an improvement.
_____________________________________________________________________________
James Hale     			Lincoln School of Health Sciences
Computing Unit			La Trobe University,Bundoora, AUSTRALIA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My sinless brother is my guide to peace.		|	Lesson 351
My sinful brother is my guide to pain.			|	Workbook P470
And which I choose to see I will behold.		|
_____________________________________________________________________________