Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner
From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: Problem with Think C and Polygons!
Message-ID: <1991Jun17.144255.18518@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 17 Jun 91 14:42:55 GMT
References: <0E010021.a2n8ad@gla-aux.uucp>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at U-C
Lines: 12

In article <0E010021.a2n8ad@gla-aux.uucp> glenn%gla-aux.uucp@skinner.cs.uoregon.edu writes:
>>  ClosePoly;
>   ^^^^^^^^^
>Why couldn't they have simply said that the function parens are missing?

A function name without the parens is a legal expression (it's the address
of the function), and a legal expression is a legal statement.  "2;" is a
legal statement, f'rinstance.  The only problem here is that, ClosePoly
being inline, there's no way to take its address.
--
Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office
Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu  UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner