Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!ucbvax!transarc.com!Ward_Travis
From: Ward_Travis@transarc.com
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: uuq bate rate fix
Message-ID: <UcLG=Rn0BwwsBf4dw7@transarc.com>
Date: 17 Jun 91 21:00:13 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Lines: 9


It was mentioned (about three weeks ago) that the bug in uuq which
causes the -b option to fail had been found. I recall that it was an
atof() call where an atoi() was really intended.

Does anyone have a replacement image, or better yet, a patch for this
fix? I am running NeXT 2.1 . Pointers to FTP servers are welcome.

                               -wt