Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!littlei!intelhf!agora!tima
From: tima@agora.rain.com (Tim Anderson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: 9600 baud modems
Message-ID: <1991Jun18.153432.18826@agora.rain.com>
Date: 18 Jun 91 15:34:32 GMT
References: <13483@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <5899@uniol.UUCP>
Organization: Open Communications Forum
Lines: 16

In article <5899@uniol.UUCP> Gerhard.Moeller@arbi.informatik.uni-oldenburg.de (Gerhard Moeller) writes:
>rab@speech1.cs.cmu.edu (Robert Brennan) writes:
>
>
>>I am looking for a new pair of 9600 baud modems...
>
>I use an Anchor 96E5, which works with the NeXT very well...

DO NOT -I will repeat this- DO NOT get an ANCHOR modem. I've had nothing
but problems with one of the three that we purchased AND SINCE THE COMPANY
WENT BELLY UP, getting warranty service on these boat ANCHOR's will be 
next to impossible. An appropriately named product.

An extremely pissed customer,

tima@agora.rain.com