Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!eagle!opus.lerc.nasa.gov!eddc From: eddc@opus.lerc.nasa.gov (Dave Carek) Subject: Re: "mailbox: " does it Do the Right Thing? Message-ID: <1991Jun17.132114.5224@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov Organization: NASA Lewis Research Center [Cleveland] References: <1991Jun13.172559.21771@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1991 13:21:14 GMT Lines: 28 In article <1991Jun13.172559.21771@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> shenkin@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu writes: >I love mailbox, which is new with the 3.3 release I just installed on my >4d25tg. However, it has one undesirable behavior that I have noticed: >it seems to trap all interrupts. Though this is useful in some places, >it disallows aborting a reply or message. That is, if I run Mail from >a wsh, then change my mind about sending it, I can hit ^C twice, and it >cancels the message. Since the mail window opened by mailbox traps >interrupts, however, I can't do this. The only way to abort the reply >is to close the window, which may not do what you want, since you might >want to delete things that you've read, or something like that, before you >quit. > Since your using Mail you can use "~q". The following is an entry from the Mail man page. ~q Abort the message being sent, copying the message to ``dead.letter'' in your home directory if save is set. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | David Carek | phone: 216-433-8396 | | NASA Lewis Research Center | | | Cleveland, Ohio 44135 | email: eddc@opus.lerc.nasa.gov | |---------------------------------------------------------------------| | Engineer -> An innovative imaginative scientist who must design the | | improbable using the impossible on a budget that is invisible | -----------------------------------------------------------------------