Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!boingo.med.jhu.edu!haven.umd.edu!uflorida!travis!hrshcx!steved From: steved@hrshcx.csd.harris.com (Steve Daukas) Newsgroups: comp.text Subject: Help with choosing a "word processor" Keywords: Desktop Publishing Packages vs Typesetting With TeX Message-ID: <1134@hrshcx.csd.harris.com> Date: 18 Jun 91 16:50:05 GMT Organization: Harris Computer Systems - Fort Lauderdale, Fl. Lines: 71 Greetings and Salutations! I posted this to comp.text.tex and comp.text.desktop, but I havn't received any responses (a few days now) so I thought I'd try here... I have just begun researching various DOS and OS/2 based "editors" or "word processors" or "type setters" and have finally been made aware of these groups. I hope you will indulge my questions if they are old hat... I am seeking some inputs and advice on getting a "word processor" that will run on DOS, DOS with Windows 3.0, and/or OS/2 (Rel. 2.0). I am not necessarily looking for all variants at once, just some indication as to availabilty in each environment. I am currently running DOS 4.1, Windows 3.0, have a 386sx, a 85 Meg disk, and 1 Meg of Ram (I know - I'm getting more memory in a week or so). I am interested in OS/2 if it really pans out in the sense of running multiple windows at the same time. What I want to be able to do is: 1) run multiple copies of the "word processor" along with other applications (compilers, spread sheets, etc.) at one time... 2) run them all in a windowed environment where I can cut and paste from various applications into the "word processor" (e.g., a spreadsheet here, a picture there, some prose, and maybe a piece of example code). The cut and paste doesn't need to be as obvious as dragging with a mouse - I just need a straight forward way to access the other data I want to include... 3) have it WYSIWYG if possible, or at least a previewer of some sort... 4) and it would be nice if I had access to the underlying "code" of the "word processor" along the lines of TeX. Being an engineer, I have this need to be able to have a fine grain of control. I am specifically interested in setting up macros to do the things I always do, like headers, footers, etc.. I am used to troff under Unix using Vi as the editor so this kind of "environment" is OK. I would use this "word processor" for school (MBA) and work (proposals, diagrams, etc.). I am interested in the desktop publishing sort of package because of the nature of MBA programs - flash is cash, as well as the GUI. I also don't have alot of time to come up to speed on something like TeX in the short term (specifically charts, graphs, etc. - non-prose stuff), but would like to be able to customize whatever I am using in the long term. The disadvantage here is money. I'm not looking to spend $400 dollars for a package that I can't customize to some extent. Something like TeX has its appeal because I am using troff now, I can define anything I want, and TeX is free. The disadvantage is time. I don't have very much so I don't want to have to read an entire manual before I can produce something that looks reasonable. Also, getting pictures and/or charts into TeX (as I understand it) is painful. The kind of finished product I will be producing is a very professional looking document with charts, graphs, tables, columns of text as well as regular "double-spaced" formats, equations, and perhaps an image or two. This finished product will be seen by professors, the various big shots where I work, and customers. So, it really must look professional. I am open to all suggestions and comments! Integrated packages (word processor, spread sheet, graphics, et. al.) are also under consideration (and would be considered preferable if I decide against TeX), so fire away! Any advice would be greatly appreciated! I will summarize for anyone interested. Thanks! Steve -- .-------------------..-------------------------. | Stephen C. Daukas || sdaukas@csd.harris.com | | (617) 221-1834 || uunet!hcx1!misg!sdaukas | `-------------------'`-------------------------'