Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!spool.mu.edu!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!fuug!sics.se!ifi.uio.no!enag From: erik@naggum.no (Erik Naggum) Newsgroups: comp.text.sgml Subject: Re: Seeking On-Line SGML document for Parser Regression Test Message-ID: <82-7640-006-X/0006@naggum.no> Date: 19 Jun 91 15:46:41 GMT References: <25273@gremlin.nrtc.northrop.com> Sender: enag@ifi.uio.no (Erik Naggum) Reply-To: Erik Naggum Organization: Naggum Software, Oslo, Norway Lines: 20 Nntp-Posting-Host: gyda.ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: jpl@bat.nrtc.northrop.com's message of 29 May 91 18: 13:26 GMT Originator: enag@gyda.ifi.uio.no Jeff P. Lankford writes: | | I have built a parser that can analyze the syntax of SGML documents. | However, i know there are some defects (and i expect a lot more i | don't know about). In order to find those i'm currrently unaware of | (lots i'm sure), i'd like to form a collection of valid and specific | invalid SGML documents to serve as a regression test data base. There is something called "the 'gonzo' test", about which all I know is that GCA says "all conforming SGML parsers MUST be able to parse this test" in a blurb about "The XGML Validator (TM)", about which I know very little. (What does the "X" stand for? Why not use "S"?) Does anybody have more information on this "gonzo" test? -- Erik Naggum Professional Programmer +47-2-836-863 Naggum Software Electronic Text 0118 OSLO, NORWAY Computer Communications