Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy
From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: Proposed Renaming (was Re: Regular pipe vs. Named Pipe)
Message-ID: <1991Jun17.032958.6386@research.canon.oz.au>
Date: 17 Jun 91 03:29:58 GMT
References: <14079@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <14192: Jun923:16:0791@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <2736@root44.co.uk> <25101:Jun1217:29:0291@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Jun13.184737.6343@eci386.uucp> <677015028.20230@mindcraft.com>
Sender: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Reply-To: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Lines: 10

In article <677015028.20230@mindcraft.com> ronnie@mindcraft.com (Ronnie Kon) writes:
>I suggest we rename this group to comp.unix.named_pipes_and_shared_libraries,
>to more accurately reflect the contents of the group.  :-)
>
>				Ronnie

No, no, no! It should only be "comp.unix.named_pipes" as we all know
that shared libraries are not necessary ;-)
-- 
Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)