Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!shodha.enet.dec.com!alan From: alan@shodha.enet.dec.com ( Alan's Home for Wayward Notes File.) Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix Subject: Re: Adding/setting up mem, disk, cd drive, sys admin? Summary: Long answer, Part I. Message-ID: <3386@shodha.enet.dec.com> Date: 16 Jun 91 04:15:34 GMT References: <44675@netnews.upenn.edu> Organization: Digital Equipment Corp. - Colorado Springs, CO. Lines: 126 In article <44675@netnews.upenn.edu>, lau@desci.wharton.upenn.edu (Yan K. Lau) writes: > We recently got some new hardware for our DECstation 5000/200. Most of > the installation seems straight forward but I have a few of questions. > > I added two 8 meg memory boards. The memory shows up on the hardware > test. What do I need to do to make the operating system aware of the > new memory? I couldn't find any doc on this, maybe I'm not looking in > the right place. You boot the system. There's nothing special you need to do if the memory is correctly installed. Now if ULTRIX isn't seeing the memory when you boot the system, then you have a problem. Make sure the memory is in contiguous slots. You may also have problems if you're trying to mix the older 8 MB boards with the newer 32 MB boards. If the addition of the new memory takes you over 64 MB then you may want to change the "physmem" parameter in the configuration file, rebuild and boot the new kernel. The value is used to determine the page tables. It seems that only three values are interesting; less than a low water mark, above a high water mark and either side of 64 MB. For DECsystems the files of interest are in /sys/machine/mips/{genassym.c,vmparam.h}. > > I added 2 RZ57s in an expansion unit to the system. I ran MAKEDEV and > newfs. The results were about 950megs total with 850megs available. Is > this normal? I read somewhere that the system takes about 10% for > (mumble...mumble). Is there a way to change this percentage, would one > want to do this? This seems to be normal(*). The difference between the 850 and 950 is the 10% reserved free space. You can change this when you create the file system using the -m option of newfs(8) or later with the tunefs(8) command. You may not want to though, at least until you need to. Early studies of the Fast File System showed that block allocation started becoming slower when the file system was more than 90% full. On the other hand, not being able to allocate a block knowing that there really is free space, is more than a little inconvient. Use the 90% number as a indicator of when you need more disk space. The disadvantage of having the file system that full is that the performance may suffer. Blocks allocated to large files will be scattered all over the disk, instead being kept close together. Small files may also end being scattered all over. Keep the 10% in reserve and if you really need it later you can change it and start looking to get more space or clean up the existing space. If you're using the space for archival on-line storage that won't change much, then you should be able to set the minfree number to whatever is needed. If you're very careful about file placement and allocation the performance might not suffer to badly. I'd guess that you'd want to create the large files first and then do the small ones. (*) I looked around a bit and the RZ57 seems a bit strange. I'll discuss it in a seperate follow-up. > > We got an RRD42 CD drive that has the headphone jack and audio LR outs. > Does anyone have software that can play music CDs on this drive? I > think it's much nicer than the bulky RRD40(?). I know that some people internally have written software for it. All of it has been clearly marked "Internal Use Only", so it's not available to customers. I won't be surprised to see customer written software showing up shortly to do the same thing, if the documentation is reasonable. > > Oh, we also got Ultrix 4.2 recently. I only recently upgraded the systems > to 4.1. and everything was working so well. Read the V4.2 release novel (notes) to see if there is any particular feature or bug fix that you need. Please realize that in about six months the CSC will stop treating V4.1 as a supported version though. If you have a support contract the first words you hear in answer to a problem may be "Please upgrade to V4.mumble". Beyond that, upgrade when it's convient to do so. Now, if you start exercising some mysterious V4.1 bug, then the fix might be upgrade. > > Another thing, do you have to run lmf on each machine to install the licenses > for each product. We only have a half dozen machines with one acting as the > server(dms) for the others. Still, it was a bit tedious typing in all the > information for each machine to register a product. There's probably a way > to type it just once and reuse, no? If you have the PAK online you can use this to register it from a file: # lmf register - < PAK-file Once you've typed in all the LMF data and checksum stuff you may be able to save a copy of the that to a known file before exiting the editor. If you have DECnet installed then you may also be able to use the online PAK as a guide; /usr/lib/dnet_shared/{mumble-something-obvious}. > > Sorry if some of these questions seems simple. We've only recently gotten > the sys admin doc set and I haven't plowed through all of it yet. Please SPR or use the Reader Comments page to let us officially know about any problems you have with the documentation. > > Just thought of another thing. Is there a way to set up yellow pages without > being a bind server? Sounds like a wierd question. What I want to do is > have a common /etc/passwd, /etc/group files for our DECstations and still use > our campus-wide name server. I have many of the system I manage setup to use bind for the hosts and YP for everything else. Just use svcsetup to pick and choose. > > > Yan. > -- > )~ Yan K. Lau lau@kings.wharton.upenn.edu The Wharton School -- Alan Rollow alan@nabeth.cxn.dec.com