Xref: utzoo news.admin:15250 news.software.b:8272
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!Firewall!uunet!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Giving C News a *HUG*)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.software.b
Subject: Re: Really funny jokes being missed
Message-ID: <qPHJ48w164w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: 14 Jun 91 16:16:13 GMT
References: <9106091809.53@rmkhome.UUCP>
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
Lines: 23

rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
> In article <Vu3y312w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Giving C News a *
> >By the latter I mean that those who want me to shut up about this issue will
> >have to convince me that C News's behaviour is correct; I won't just give up
> 
> I have listened to this debate for a while,

Judging from your question, I am supremely doubtful as to the accuracy of
that statement.

>                                     If 100 postings from your site each
> produce 500 bad header email messages in one day, who pays for this?

As far as I am aware, nobody is suggesting that every C News site send email
to the source of a bad article.

Quite what relevance your question has to the debate at hand is therefore
unclear.


mathew