Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!cronkite!newstop!sun!amdcad!jetsun!pyramid!infmx!aland From: aland@informix.com (Colonel Panic) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: Relational Database info needed. Message-ID: <1991Jun22.023640.21523@informix.com> Date: 22 Jun 91 02:36:40 GMT References: <5383.28501503@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> <1991Jun09.222112.10715@chinet.chi.il.us> <1991Jun13.182129.21197@dbase.a-t.com> Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News) Organization: International Brotherhood of Geeks, Local 619 Lines: 32 In article <1991Jun13.182129.21197@dbase.a-t.com> awd@dbase.a-t.com (Alastair Dallas) writes: >dBASE IV is implementing a broad cross-platform strategy to satisfy just >this sort of requirement: One database across many environments. We >are currently shipping on DOS, VMS, Macintosh and several flavors of >Unix (such as SCO Xenix imminent if not already). Windows has been >announced for year's end (I believe). These flavors of dBASE read >each other's application object code (.dbo) without recompilation. >I think product compatibility across platforms is going to be a >significant factor to everyone eventually--apparently Ashton-Tate >agrees with me and they are investing heavily now to get there first. "Get there first"??? I think you're a tad too late. Informix-4GL has been pcode platform-compatible (between dozens of UNIX environments and DOS) for over two years. I suspect others of our competitors may have as well. >The second poster ("Someone else," above) made the comment that other >xBase vendors might have cross-platform products by next year. To >which I answer, "Not if they're doing anything else right now," >because this stuff is HARD. Not if portability is designed into the language in the first place... >/alastair/ -- Alan Denney aland@informix.com {pyramid|uunet}!infmx!aland "To be labeled as a jazz singer is limiting. I like to think of myself as one who has simply been infused with a lot of music." - Bobby McFerrin