Path: utzoo!telecom-request
Date: Saturday, 22 Jun 1991 09:28:12 EDT
From: "Peter M. Weiss" <PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Operator Busy Break-In Now Costs $1.60
Message-ID: <telecom11.478.5@eecs.nwu.edu>
Organization: Penn State University
Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 478, Message 5 of 9
Lines: 15

In article <telecom11.474.8@eecs.nwu.edu>, gws@cblph.att.com (Gary W Sanders)
says:

> [Moderator's Note: (deleted)
> The Operator did her work by notifying the party.

Since the caller and the callee are potential chargeable w/ a misde-
meanor crime, I wonder if the Operator misdials and interupts an
in-progress data xfer, if the (s)he can be charged with some crime.
(I'm just trying to get everyone chargeable w/ something and not leave
any one out.)

Pete