Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!megatest!djones
From: djones@megatest.UUCP (Dave Jones)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: LL(1) C grammar
Message-ID: <18959@prometheus.megatest.UUCP>
Date: 18 Jun 91 12:11:44 GMT
References: <91-06-021@comp.compilers>
Organization: Megatest Corporation, San Jose, Ca
Lines: 10

From article <91-06-021@comp.compilers>, by jos@and.nl (J. Horsmeier):
> ... brew LL(1) parser generator ...
> ... For several reasons (interpretation
> versus compilation, incremental parser building etc.), we do not want to use
> lex/yacc.


Huh? There's nothing that can be done with an LL parser
that can't be done with an LR parser. What do you mean by "interpretation
versus compilation, incremental parser building etc"?