Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!mcsun!ukc!icdoc!pj From: pj@doc.ic.ac.uk (Paul Jarvis) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Does TC's farrealloc have a bug? Message-ID: <1991Jun21.152700.25820@doc.ic.ac.uk> Date: 21 Jun 91 15:27:00 GMT References: <1991Jun19.083945.8921@ucthpx.uct.ac.za> <6574@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> Organization: Department of Computing, Imperial College, University of London, UK. Lines: 9 Nntp-Posting-Host: swan.doc.ic.ac.uk I have recently had a report of problems using huge far pointers and allocating and freeing memory. The problem appeared to be that the free process did not work hence memory got lost. The compiler was Turbo C (sorry version not known). Changing to Borland C++ compiler with identical code - i.e. the same program no problem. My conclusion is that there may be some problems with allocating large memory chuncks but I sure don't want to try to prove it. Paul (pj@doc.ic.ac.uk)