Xref: utzoo comp.lang.c:40386 comp.lang.c++:14330
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!olivea!uunet!munnari.oz.au!metro!grivel!loki!kevin
From: kevin@loki.une.oz.au (Kevin Pollard)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: TC20.0 to BC++?
Keywords: C upgrade
Message-ID: <1594@loki.une.oz.au>
Date: 24 Jun 91 12:03:56 GMT
Followup-To: comp.lang.c
Organization: University of NewEngland, Northern Rivers (Lismore)
Lines: 19

Can someone tell me if it's worth upgading from TurboC 2.0 to Borland C++

I have written, and am continually upgrading, large C programs - integrated
business packages. In the next six months I do NOT intend to modify the
packages to work under windows, nor do I intend to learn C++

But, from what I can gather, it may be worth upgrading to BC++ to take
advantage of the improvements made to non-objective C, and the improved
development environment.

Am I correct? and if so what are the improvements to the development
environment - given that I will not be using C++ for a while, just C


Or is there anything else better than BC++?
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Aard-vark  a very difficult word which you don't need to know.'
---------------------------------------- The Oxfod Simplified Dictionary.