Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU!gildea From: gildea@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Stephen Gildea) Newsgroups: comp.mail.mh Subject: Re: Mh-e.el antisocial?? Message-ID: <9106211520.AA07388@alex.lcs.mit.edu> Date: 21 Jun 91 15:20:02 GMT References: <1991Jun13.153240.23455@uunet.uu.net> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science Lines: 46 1) If I try to start out my mh session by doing mh-visit-folder, it complains because the mh-temp buffer doesn't already exist. Ugly... I get around this by doing an mh-list-folders first, but that's a kludge. mh-visit-folder is not an "entry point," that is, a function which will start up mh-e properly. Instead call mh-rmail with an argument, which will initialize mh-e and prompt for a folder to visit. 2) If mh-e hasn't visited the folder before, it cames it doesn't exist and asks if I want to create it. The .mh_sequences file is already there and the folder exists. It shouldn't really object that the folder doesn't exist. This problem may be caused by incorrect entry to mh-e. See above. 3) When I do "a" to reply to a message, it complains that $MHHOME/reply file doesn't exist and then creates a buffer "draft-mhpath: bad message list drafts". If I do it again, it creates a buffer "draft-draft-..." and still complains about the reply file. I use a drafts folder, and I have mh-draft-folder set to "drafts". It does create the reply file and puts the message in it, but the file contents don't wind up in the draft-mhpath buffer. Finally, it winds up putting the results of the edit in $MHHOME/../"mhpath: bad message list drafts" (complete with spaces in the file name. You should not be setting mh-draft-folder yourself; it gets set automatically when the Draft-Folder line is read from your profile at mh-e startup time. Again, this may be caused by incorrect entry to mh-e. 4) When you mark things for deletion and then quit without forces the updates, it doesn't ask if you might want to force the updates. That's a feature, not a bug :-) But you can define a new function to do the action you want: (define mh-update-and-quit () "Execute queued folder commands and quit mh-e." (interactive) (mh-execute-commands) (mh-quit)) < Stephen MIT X Consortium