Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!lll-winken!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!ukma!lunatix!mhitting
From: mhitting@lunatix.uucp (Mark Hittinger)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Len Rose sentenced to Prison Term
Message-ID: <1991Jun21.230332.23713@lunatix.uucp>
Date: 21 Jun 91 23:03:32 GMT
References: <9106191748.AA23201@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> <43487@cup.portal.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: Lexington Public Access Unix
Lines: 13

In article <43487@cup.portal.com> hkhenson@cup.portal.com (H Keith Henson) writes:
>I notice people are fairly upset over the Len Rose sentence.  I am too,
> ...
>Frankly, I find it hard to believe that ATT has thought through the
>consequences of pissing off a lot of the technical folks in the country.
>The marketing effects alone could be staggering.  

This is a good point.  I agree that AT&T has made a serious mistake in
claiming such a high value for login.c.  I normally don't want to do business
with uncompetitive monopoly structures anyway, but a firm that would actually
do this is clearly off my list for life.

Reply to: an288@freenet.cleveland.edu