Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.tcp-ip:16663 comp.unix.xenix.sco:2838 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!m2xenix!quagga!proxima!olsa99!tabbs!tabbs!aris From: aris@tabbs.UUCP (Aris Stathakis) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.unix.xenix.sco Subject: Re: SCO Unix 16-bit cards Message-ID: Date: 18 Jun 91 16:45:49 GMT References: <1991Jun12.200105.5024@group1.UUCP> Organization: TABBS - Totally Awesome BBS Lines: 23 In <1991Jun12.200105.5024@group1.UUCP> johnw@group1.uucp (John Wheeler) writes: >After repeated calls to SCO, which, by the way, has the LONGEST >queing mechanism I've ever encountered, I have been able to find >_NO_ 16-bit cards supported by SCO Unix. CAN THIS BE TRUE? I find >it hard to believe that I can get 16-bit drivers for a simple MS-DOS >machine but *NOT* for our multi-gigabyte SCO hosts!!!! >Does ANYBODY know of any 16-bit drivers for SCO Unix? >(WD 8013 preferred).... Try the Racal-Interlan NI6510. The drivers are available from Interlan themselves. Apparently, some data-comms magazine rated the NI6510 as the best performing 16bit ethernet card a while back (sorry, can't quote the exact magazine or date). I've used them quite a bit and can safely say that they work pretty well :-) Aris -- Aris Stathakis | Bang: ..!uunet!ddsw1!olsa99!tabbs!aris or aris@tabbs.UUCP - - - I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a frontal lobotomy. -