Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!news
From: scs@adam.mit.edu (Steve Summit)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: gcc and NULL function pointers.
Message-ID: <1991Jun20.213539.28188@athena.mit.edu>
Date: 20 Jun 91 21:35:39 GMT
References: <ND1CKO3@xds13.ferranti.com> <1991Jun20.164003.12151@potomac.ads.com>
Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
Reply-To: scs@adam.mit.edu
Followup-To: alt.religion.computers
Organization: Thermal Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 14

Let's not have any more null pointer discussion here (of any
kind, neither unfounded speculation nor knowledgeable, correct
responses) until every masochist who is actually interested in
discussing it has trotted over to comp.lang.c and read the
frequently-asked questions list there.  (If you can't find a
copy, be patient until July 1 when it will be posted again.  Null
pointers have been dogging Usenet for many years; a week's delay
won't kill anybody.)

Followups to alt.religion.computers, and apologies to comp.std.c
for this content-free, inflammatory meta-posting.

                                            Steve Summit
                                            scs@adam.mit.edu