Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!nosc!baron!ryptyde!dant
From: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: 680x0 vs 80x86
Message-ID: <92@ryptyde.UUCP>
Date: 22 Jun 91 10:02:03 GMT
Reply-To: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Organization: Ryptyde Timesharing (ryptyde.cts.com)
Lines: 6

"Are you suggesting that the unified cache is a limitation designed to ensure
MS-DOS compatibility?  How would a split cache break MS-DOS?"
 
This probably has something to do with the fact that the 80x86 has
general-purpose registers, as opposed to seperate address and data
registers, right? This would at least make it harder to impliment?