Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:4333 comp.sys.amiga.misc:4832 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.arc.nasa.gov!vsi1!zorch!xanthian From: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: Another Amiga reorganization needed? Message-ID: <1991Jun23.025955.25000@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Date: 23 Jun 91 02:59:55 GMT References: <1991Jun18.092655.12436@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Organization: SF-Bay Public-Access Unix Lines: 26 caw@miroc.Chi.IL.US (Christopher A. Wichura) writes: > I, too, think that c.s.a.futures would be a good > idea. And I do realize the problem with flames. > However, for a group that could potentially have a > fair number of messages, how much of a slowdown > would having a moderator be? Probably not as bad as the current slowdown to counter offensive flamers that sidetracks the discussion on a frequent basis. There's really not much use pulling the material out of .advocacy if the quality of the discussion can't be raised a _lot_, and moderation looks like the way to go. Other comments on this issue? /// It's Amiga /// for me: why Kent, the man from xanth. \\\/// settle for \XX/ anything less? -- Convener, COMPLETED comp.sys.amiga grand reorganization. Here we go again.