Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uunet!bonnie.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!ug.cs.dal.ca!dinn
From: dinn@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael 'Moose' Dinn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Some WB2.0 Peeves
Message-ID: <1991Jun24.031905.24576@cs.dal.ca>
Date: 24 Jun 91 03:19:05 GMT
References: <1991Jun23.210647.20152@news.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@cs.dal.ca (USENET News)
Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Lines: 18
Nntp-Posting-Host: ug.cs.dal.ca

In article <1991Jun23.210647.20152@news.iastate.edu> taab5@isuvax.iastate.edu writes:
>to the top of a window and a menu is pulled down (I use DECterm, which has
>menus), any motion going on in the current window does not stop.  (If a
>bunch of text is scrolling, it keeps on scrolling, for instance).  Also,

>   My question is: why can't this be so on an Amiga?  With WB2.0 (or 1.3
>or whatever), when you pull down a menu or drag a menu or icon or whatever,

Get NeXTWindows and PopUpMenus... both are PD. NeXTWindows  makes the screeen
continue when a window is moved, I believe PopUpMenus will let the screen keep
going with a menu down...

--
 Michael Dinn, Sysop of the Moose's Swamp - Nova Scotia's largest Amiga BBS
 +1 (902) 463-0483, 3/12/24/48/96/14,400 baud * 290 Megabytes online
 Home: moose%swamp%banke1@cs.dal.ca (Amiga1000 running UUCP/BBS)
 School: mdinn@ac.dal.ca, dinn@ug.cs.dal.ca     | These are my opinions and
 Work:   01Moose@dalac.bitnet IRC-Op: Moose     | noone else's. (blame me :-)