Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!dirac!gibbs.physics.purdue.edu!sho
From: sho@gibbs.physics.purdue.edu (Sho Kuwamoto)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: YOU PEOPLE HAD BETTER GET WIT THE PROGRAM!! (Was: Re: Commodore Business Machines)
Message-ID: <5349@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>
Date: 24 Jun 91 09:50:18 GMT
References: <1991Jun23.194902.21351@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1991Jun23.202728.18615@news.iastate.edu> <4747.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz>
Sender: news@dirac.physics.purdue.edu
Organization: Purdue Univ. Physics Dept, W.Lafayette, IN
Lines: 14

In article <oedipus> jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers) writes:
>    Wrong. It does work as well as the Mac's, if not better, but
>    applications don't use it. And thank heavens they don't, otherwise
>    there would have been less incentive to develop things like ARexx,
>    which are a step beyond the low-intensity cut/paste operations of
>    a clipboard.

Can someone describe ARexx to me?  I'm keenly interested.  I'd be
especially grateful if someone could compare it to AppleEvents, but
it's not really neccessary.

-Sho
-- 
sho@physics.purdue.edu