Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!infonode!hychejw From: hychejw@infonode.ingr.com (Jeff W. Hyche) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: The Amiga's Future Message-ID: <1991Jun25.164959.16960@infonode.ingr.com> Date: 25 Jun 91 16:49:59 GMT References: <1991Jun21.183216.29240@news.iastate.edu> <88@ryptyde.UUCP><17300@chopin.udel.edu> Organization: Intergraph Corp. Huntsville, AL Lines: 21 rkushner@sycom.UUCP (Ronald Kushner) writes: >using(with reselection problems), and I had TWO GVP Series II HD controllers >that both started acting flaky after a few months of use, and trying to get >something exchanged with GVP is hard when you can not have much downtime...My That is not the story I have about GVP. I have had my GVP system for awhile now and I can say I have had no problems with it. >Not only did Commodore get 20 or so 3rd party HD controllers because they >never included SCSI in the motherboard design, they probably got 17 or so 3rd >party controllers that wouldn't meet Commodore's quality standards if they >decided to use them as standard equipment on a certain machine.... Not what the July 1991 issue of AmigaWorld says. It has a nice review on controlers for Ami. Only two that I remember didn't meet CBM quality standards. -- // Jeff Hyche There can be only one! \\ // Usenet: hychejw@infonode.ingr.com \X/ Freenet: ap255@po.CWRU.Edu