Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!psuvax1!rutgers!cbmvax!andy
From: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re:  Information on Amiga Technical Reference Seri
Message-ID: <22625@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Date: 21 Jun 91 14:51:59 GMT
References: <3118@public.BTR.COM> <22582@cbmvax.commodore.com> <3137@public.BTR.COM>
Reply-To: andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy Finkel)
Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
Lines: 31

In article <3137@public.BTR.COM> valentin@public.BTR.COM (Valentin Pepelea) writes:
>In article <22582@cbmvax.commodore.com> andy@cbmvax.commodore.com (Andy
>I have asked you already once to tell me what side effect your are claiming
>is being depended on.
>
>If you refuse to divulge it, I have to conclude that this is false, and that
>you have decided to make a personal attack. You did not like to see me
>disagreeing with you, and therefore you thought that a stab at my reputation
>would do the trick.
>

Sorry you viewed it as a personal attack.  I carefully did not
mention anything about the authorship of the 2.0 parallel.device,
but attempted to use an example that you would understamd.

>Again, I demand that you tell us what the alleged side effect is.

This is the last word I'm going to say on this, and just as a favor
I will remind you of the cia resource loop back mode which
is found in only one of the interrupt chains.  (Remember now ?)


			andy
-- 
andy finkel		{uunet|rutgers|amiga}!cbmvax!andy
Commodore-Amiga, Inc.

 "2.0 is not the answer.  2.0 is the question.  Yes is the answer."

Any expressed opinions are mine; but feel free to share.
I disclaim all responsibilities, all shapes, all sizes, all colors.