Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!SSDC.HONEYWELL.COM!bergstr
From: bergstr@SSDC.HONEYWELL.COM (-Darryl Bergstrom   Apollo/Symbolics/News/Mail Administrator)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Problems with FTN 10.[78] / 425t
Message-ID: <9106212044.AA24742@nntp.ssdc.honeywell.com>
Date: 21 Jun 91 20:44:47 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 30



We are having some strange results from some simulations running on a 400t and 
a 425t.  I was wondering if there are known differences with the math done on 
a 68882 -vs- 68040.  The results that follow are using FTN 10.7 / SR10.2.4 
(10.8 on 10.3.4 provided similar results)...

norm: 400t SR 10.2.4 
  
  iday= 160 clk= 0.0000000 tsen= 78.00000 tair= 0.0000000 err2= 0.0000000 stat= 1
  iday= 161 clk= 4.4386904E-03 tsen= 77.81004 tair= 78.03871 err2=
-0.1899567 stat= 0
  Total duration of fan over-run =  134.6400063950568 minutes
 Integrated total cooling capacity =    69.075 kWh =    235754. btu
  
clavin: 425t SR 10.3.4
 
  iday= 160 clk= 0.0000000 tsen= 78.00000 tair= 0.0000000 err2= 0.0000000 stat= 1
  iday= 161 clk= 3.4386902E-03 tsen= 77.82001 tair= 78.07195 err2=
-0.1799927 stat= 0
  Total duration of fan over-run =  162.3600077116862 minutes
 Integrated total cooling capacity =    83.005 kWh =    283297. btu
 
 
Any ideas? (hmmm.... nick here says that JT from SSEC.honeywell.com will be
the first to reply.   The stop watch is running....)

-Darryl Bergstrom   Apollo/Symbolics/News/Mail Administrator
-Honeywell SRC/SSDC IS Minneapolis, MN
-bergstr@ssdc.honeywell.com