Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!fernwood!uupsi!sugar!peterc
From: peterc@Sugar.NeoSoft.com (Peter Creath)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: All Commercial Software Developers or Companies (pls read)
Summary: testing software prior to buying it.
Message-ID: <1991Jun24.024712.25346@Sugar.NeoSoft.com>
Date: 24 Jun 91 02:47:12 GMT
Article-I.D.: Sugar.1991Jun24.024712.25346
References: <25662@unix.SRI.COM> <1991Jun23.011635.19552@gn.ecn.purdue.edu> <BAUMGART.91Jun23150846@esquire.esquire.dpw.com>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
Lines: 22

Well, I wouldn't have any problem with your argument EXCEPT:
 
Take a look at shareware.  You've got workable demos that you can test
until you decide to keep it.  Then you're supposed to buy it.  This system
eliminates the SHIT that large corporations are allowed to get away with.
(pardon my emphatic adjective)  Take a look at, say, a database on the
IBM.  Some resourceful guy decides to recompile it on the Macintosh and
sell it for $500 (the IBM version being $400, but they need the extra $$$
to compensate for the "risk" they took in developing the product for such
a limited market).  This piece of software has NO mac interface.  It's
just text, just like the ol' IBM version.  Now tell me it's not shafting
the customer to do that...  Well, to avoid getting royally shafted by
large corps (and very few small corps), people will test software before
buying it.  If the company offered demos, it'd eliminate the legitimate
excuse for pirating.  If everyone who pirated ended up buying the program
they used most, we wouldn't have a problem.
 
Both sides need to give & take.  (But Big Business has got the cash to
hold its interests)


--