Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!pescadero.Stanford.EDU!philip
From: philip@pescadero.Stanford.EDU (Philip Machanick)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Re: Possible Jerky Mouse FIx
Message-ID: <1991Jun23.201958.12639@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 23 Jun 91 20:19:58 GMT
References: <1991Jun22.163648.12548@techbook.com> <1991Jun22.174710.13192@techbook.com> <1991Jun23.013534.18689@neon.Stanford.EDU> <1991Jun23.144653.7803@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@neon.Stanford.EDU (USENET News System)
Reply-To: philip@pescadero.stanford.edu
Organization: Stanford University
Lines: 10

In article <1991Jun23.144653.7803@midway.uchicago.edu>, gile@quads.uchicago.edu (Aaron Giles) writes:
|> Yes, but if you look at your DECstation mouse, you'll see that it operates
|> quite differently from an Apple mouse -- no rolling ball to collect all that
|> dust!  :-)
No, the DECstation does not use an optical mouse. It _does_ have
a rolling ball - it just seems to be a better design (from the
point of view of not picking up dirt).
-- 
Philip Machanick
philip@pescadero.stanford.edu