Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!guinness!usenet
From: bcarter@claven.idbsu.edu (Bruce Carter)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: Hypercard 2.1 and Developers Kit, differences?
Message-ID: <1991Jun24.154834.26893@guinness.idbsu.edu>
Date: 24 Jun 91 15:48:34 GMT
Article-I.D.: guinness.1991Jun24.154834.26893
References: <56871@nigel.ee.udel.edu> <13282@uwm.edu>
Sender: usenet@guinness.idbsu.edu (Usenet News mail)
Organization: Boise State University - Courseware Development
Lines: 14
Nntp-Posting-Host: brucespc

In article <13282@uwm.edu> zark@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Steven M Kosloske) writes:
>I recently bought the HyperCard 2.1 upgrade for $49, (yeah, it took me long
>enough) and I saw that they're selling a HyperCard Developers kit, (they
>meaning Claris) for $140.  Is the $50 upgrade crippled at all, or does
>the Developers kit have a lot of extra toys for development/debugging
>stacks?

The Development (not Developer's) kit just has more documentation, and may have
a couple of extra stacks (I have heard differing reports on this).  The
HyperCard application itself is the same in both packages.
                                     <->
Bruce Carter, Courseware Development Coordinator      bcarter@claven.idbsu.edu
Boise State University, Boise, ID  83725              duscarte@idbsu.bitnet
(This message contains personal opinions only)        (208)385-1250@phone