Xref: utzoo alt.religion.computers:2533 comp.windows.ms.programmer:3219 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!slxsys!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (Giving C News a *HUG*) Newsgroups: alt.religion.computers,comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: ap, Windows BASIC Message-ID: <2mRu43w164w@mantis.co.uk> Date: 20 Jun 91 18:24:12 GMT References: <1991Jun20.034708.2816@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 39 rogerhef@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Roger Heflin) writes: > In <4k4q47w164w@mantis.co.uk> mathew@mantis.co.uk (Giving C News a *HUG*) wri > >> One of the great things > >> I like about the QB environment is when you press the F2 key, a window > >> pops up with a list of all your procedures/functions. Click on the one > >> you want to look at and bingo. Very nice. > > >My editor does that, for C, C++, Pascal, Modula-2, Clipper, or any other > >language you care to tell it about. > > Yes your editor can do that with C,C++,Pascal, .... but you had to take > time to set it up to work correctly, No I didn't. I just put the installation disk in, typed SETUP, and answered a few questions. Then I loaded my C program, typed CTRL-G, and it gave me a list of all the procedures and functions I could jump to. I then loaded a Clipper program and did the same thing, and that worked as well. > Does your editor also do full debugging? No, my debugger does full debugging. > QB's debugger surpasses any debugger > I have found on any Unix machine on relibility and usability. So? I thought we were talking about DOS and Windows programming. I wouldn't hold up UNIX as a good example of anything much. > I have never had a QB program 'coredump'. It is a considerably safer programming > enviroment compared to C or C++. That's mainly because it doesn't have pointers, which is a pretty big price to pay. I'd rather be allowed to use pointers, and have the machine bring up the appropriate line of source code whenever a pointer error occurs. mathew