Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!yale.edu!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!382!60!Margo.Downey
From: Margo.Downey@f60.n382.z1.fidonet.org (Margo Downey)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: hot topic
Message-ID: <16350@handicap.news>
Date: 21 Jun 91 19:11:12 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Margo.Downey@f60.n382.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:382/60 - DATAQUEST, Austin TX
Lines: 17
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 16350

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

Another thing--you talk specifically about incongruities of NFB.   There are
incongruities in all groups and also in every individual's thinking.  We all,
on one hand, might agree with something or do something but if a circumstance
changes, might do something else.  Do you mean (gasp) to tell me that ACB is
perfect, that it has no incongruous thinking; and that the Republican party or
the Democratic Party is totally congruous; that all religious groups have
congruous thinking.  Why single out one group?  I can't do that--maybe that's
incongruous.  I feel we are all here in life to figure it out and I don't know
a single person who's thinking hasn't been incongruous at some point.

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!382!60!Margo.Downey
Internet: Margo.Downey@f60.n382.z1.fidonet.org