Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watdragon!watyew!jdnicoll
From: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll)
Subject: Re: Fred's Operatic Death
Message-ID: <1991Jun18.170059.15059@watdragon.waterloo.edu>
Sender: news@watdragon.waterloo.edu (News Owner)
Organization: University of Waterloo
References: <1991Jun14.083756.1@vf.jsc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun17.055344.8332@sequent.com> <0094A42A.866932C0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> <1991Jun17.222205.15504@sequent.com> <0094A4DB.07478DA0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1991 17:00:59 GMT
Lines: 10

In article <0094A4DB.07478DA0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney) writes:
>In article <1991Jun17.222205.15504@sequent.com>, szabo@sequent.com writes:

	'Do NASA employees post self-serving propaganda (also 'should NASA...')'
	argument deleted. 

	I have the damned feeling I've seen this thread before. How did the 
tiff that ended with Ms Shafer briefly leaving sci.space start?

								James Nicoll