Xref: utzoo sci.space:31886 rec.video.satellite:916
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!caen!ox.com!hela!aws
From: aws@iti.org (Allen W. Sherzer)
Newsgroups: sci.space,rec.video.satellite
Subject: Re: Access to Space
Message-ID: <1991Jun18.210350.28925@iti.org>
Date: 18 Jun 91 21:03:50 GMT
References: <1991Jun18.172719.26033@sequent.com> <1991Jun18.182934.17996@iti.org> <1991Jun18.195748.27968@sequent.com>
Organization: Evil Geniuses for a Better Tomorrow
Lines: 19

In article <1991Jun18.195748.27968@sequent.com> szabo@sequent.com writes:

>Oh boy, now we're down to "good vs. evil".

I'm just using your own words Nick. If you don't like them then
don't use them. As to the rest of it, I am just pointing out that
if the standards you apply to projects you don't like where applied
to projects you do like, then they wouldn't have them either.

Communication satellites are NOT self sustaining because they only
pay incrimental launch costs. This is true for both the US and all
world providers.

  Allen
-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Allen W. Sherzer |   DETROIT: Where the weak are killed and eaten.         |
|   aws@iti.org   |                                                         |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+