Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!news.arc.nasa.gov!skipper!shafer From: shafer@skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov (Mary Shafer) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Fred's Operatic Death Message-ID: Date: 18 Jun 91 18:57:51 GMT References: <1991Jun14.083756.1@vf.jsc.nasa.gov> <1991Jun17.055344.8332@sequent.com> <0094A42A.866932C0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> <1991Jun17.222205.15504@sequent.com> <0094A4DB.07478DA0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU> <1991Jun18.170059.15059@watdragon.waterloo.edu> Sender: shafer@skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov Organization: NASA Dryden, Edwards AFB, CA Lines: 22 In-reply-to: jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca's message of 18 Jun 91 17:00:59 GMT In article <1991Jun18.170059.15059@watdragon.waterloo.edu> jdnicoll@watyew.uwaterloo.ca (James Davis Nicoll) writes: >In article <1991Jun17.222205.15504@sequent.com>, szabo@sequent.com writes: >> 'Do NASA employees post self-serving propaganda (also 'should NASA...')' >> argument deleted. >I have the damned feeling I've seen this thread before. How did the >tiff that ended with Ms Shafer briefly leaving sci.space start? Wit Nick Szabo claiming that NASA employees should only post stuff that Nick thought was OK. That is, it was OK for the informational stuff to appear, but if one disagreed with Nick ..... I'm a lot calmer now that I don't read Nick's shit. (Not nicer, just calmer.) -- Mary Shafer shafer@skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov ames!skipper.dfrf.nasa.gov!shafer NASA Ames Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, CA Of course I don't speak for NASA "Turn to kill, not to engage." CDR Willie Driscoll