Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: djdaneh@pacbell.com (Dan'l DanehyOakes)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Doctrinal/Non-Doctrinal Postings(Re: Standing back to observe)
Message-ID: <Jun.22.00.26.35.1991.6328@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 22 Jun 91 04:26:37 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 14
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu

Our Beloved Moderator Writeth:

>Personally I would prefer that when someone
>makes a non-doctrinal posting, doctrinal responses should not be
>allowed.  

Personally, I'd support such a rule -- though I may have been guilty of
this behavior myself at times.  I'm not sure how it could be worded to
make sense, though.

			Ten billion sushi dinners cried out for vengeance.
				-- Gaiman and Pratchett, GOOD OMENS

The Roach