Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian From: gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn) Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian Subject: On omni-words (from: Re: Proof that God errs) Message-ID: Date: 23 Jun 91 04:33:11 GMT Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu Lines: 20 Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu wimjan@dbf.kun.nl (Wim-Jan Hilgenbos) writes: > > BTW I for myself never use, and I believe a lot of theological ex- > planations agree on this, a word preceded by omni when speaking of > God. The way we people think doesn't allow for this. > So when speaking of God I prefer to use MOST. > [Most may not be quite strong enough. ... --clh] How about the word "holy", in the sense of being set-apart. Ie: God is powerful to an extent that sets him apart from everything else God is knowledgable " " " " [etc] - - - - - - - - Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu