Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!dirish From: dirish@csc-sun.math.utah.edu (Dudley Irish) Subject: Re: LOGIC AND RELATED STUFF In-Reply-To: minsky@media-lab.media.mit.edu's message of 27 Jun 91 00:58:50 GMT Message-ID: Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu Organization: Department of Mathematics, University of Utah References: <9106190527.AA17403@lilac.berkeley.edu> <1991Jun26.152830.12273@cis.ohio-state.edu> <1991Jun26.173142.3060@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <1991Jun27.005850.1176@news.media.mit.edu> Date: 27 Jun 91 12:24:56 In article <1991Jun27.005850.1176@news.media.mit.edu> minsky@media-lab.media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky) writes: From: minsky@media-lab.media.mit.edu (Marvin Minsky) And well they might be, because perhaps what I really meant to say was not so much that logic was bad but that the general direction of philosophy itself may be too psychologically naive. I am curious as to what leads you to say that the general direction of philosophy may be to psychologically naive. Could you please expand on this comment? -- Dudley Irish / dirish@math.utah.edu / Manager Computer Operations Center for Scientific Computing, Dept of Mathematics, University of Utah The views expressed in this message do not reflect the views of the Dept of Mathematics, the University of Utah, or the State of Utah.