Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!noao!stsci!roberts From: roberts@stsci.EDU (Jim Roberts) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: Author rebuttal on Aled Message-ID: <2841@nemesis.stsci.edu> Date: 28 Jun 91 05:17:04 GMT References: <3471@crdos1.crd.ge.COM> <3303@krafla.rhi.hi.is> <2831@nemesis.stsci.edu> <3308@krafla.rhi.hi.is> Reply-To: roberts@stsci.EDU (Jim Roberts) Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218 Lines: 31 In article <3308@krafla.rhi.hi.is> einari@rhi.hi.is (Einar Indridason) writes: >In article <2831@nemesis.stsci.edu> roberts@stsci.EDU (Jim Roberts) writes: >>present. Most editors written in the US do take care of the 8th bit, > >Most. But NOT all. And somehow I manage to stumble accross those that don't What are you doing, always stumbling across editors? Can't you find even one that works to your satisfaction? I use a text editor for about 5 years before replacing it with something enough better, or better supported, and cheap enough to get me to switch. From 1981-84 I used WordStar, from 84-90 esp (Rand Corp), and now vde. I use a couple of special purpose editors for large data files and binary files. That's it on PCs. It's no surprise to me to try an editor that isn't nearly as convenient as the one I'm already using. I presume that others must find the other editors useful, or they wouldn't be written. That's enough for me: I don't have to use them. You never gave any reason for trying to use ALED. What did it have that your present editor doesn't? You sound like you are just on a hunt for something to bitch about. If we were all like that there wouldn't be anything constructive on this group, and it would quickly disappear. >and none registered.) I then tried the alt-numberic-trick. That worked. > ^ >Conclusion: So you *knew* it didn't mask the 8th bit, as you so loudly, rudely, and incorrectly proclaimed! Give us all a break. -- Jim Roberts roberts@stsci.edu scivax::roberts