Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!rochester!cornell!batcomputer!alchemy!sethcohn From: sethcohn@alchemy.ithaca.ny.us (seth cohn) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Telebit Announcement of V.32 bis for T-1600 Message-ID: Date: 29 Jun 91 13:15:10 GMT References: <269.286C0609@zswamp.uucp> Organization: Alchemy International, Ithaca, N.Y. Lines: 27 > You see, as long as Telebit *was* modems, it was forced to keep up with > the latest and the greatest, and to offer its customers the best service. > This, in large part, was responsible for Telebit's "loyal following" (the > other major factor was UUCP spoofing, which people have since discovered is > not necessary on V.32 or V.32bis modems, the latter of which can provide > higher throughput than PEP anyway). > -- > Geoffrey Welsh - Operator, Izot's Swamp BBS (FidoNet 1:221/171) > root@zswamp.uucp or ..uunet!watmath!xenitec!zswamp!root > 602-66 Mooregate Crescent, Kitchener, ON, N2M 5E6 Canada (519)741-9553 - ok, well, you claim that a v32bis connection with UUCP can get better CPS than a uucp spoofed PEP, if so HOW? my understanding (and mind you, i'm not the clearest on this.. mostly from a friend) is that UUCP looks for too many "acknowledges" of some sort, to allow the connection speed to get very high. I was told 700 cps on a v32bis uucp connection was good questions: 1) does someone have a list of CPSs for v32bis, pep (with at w/o spoofing) and anyother major standards like v32 and HST? 2) if v32bis CAN do betterthan pep w/ spoofing, HOW does it have to be setup? any thing special? 3) would/could modifying the uucp code itself (in the uucico) be 1) posible 2)worthwhile 3)what should be changed? Seth (hoping to get a usenet feed someday on my v32bis USR modem) Seth Cohn, Service Tech. 607-273-2815 voice 607-272-7002 BBS All things posted are opinions by me, of me, for me, or to me. And another thing..........I'm not sure you're real.