Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!boulder!recnews
From: satz@cisco.com (Greg Satz)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: backplane backbone, routing or bridging?
Message-ID: <9106260741.AA02847@wolf.cisco.com>
Date: 26 Jun 91 06:43:37 GMT
Sender: news@colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 10
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Jun 91 09:59:37 PDT."
             <9106251659.AA29192@cincsac.arc.nasa.gov>
Return-Path: <cisco-request@spot.Colorado.EDU>

There is one case we came up with at the last IETF where two routers share
the same network but with different subnet masks. This is illegal.  Then
there is the case of multiple IP subnetworks on a single cable with
different subnet masks. This is also illegal.

Right?

Greg

PS. I agree that hopefully this should be written up at the next IETF too.