Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!catfood From: catfood@NCoast.ORG (Mark W. Schumann) Subject: Re: Borland language extension virtual function = [ ... ]; Organization: North Coast Public Access Un*x (ncoast) Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1991 02:53:03 GMT Message-ID: <1991Jul1.025303.4881@NCoast.ORG> References: <1991Jun27.130247.5107@mathcs.sjsu.edu> <15072@ulysses.att.com> Lines: 14 mwb@ulysses.att.com (Michael W. Balk) writes: >I was thinking of buying Borland C++, but if Borland is really going to install >non-ANSI approved syntax into their product I will probably reconsider the >purchase. Does anyone know of any other C++ vendors who might be doing or >considering doing the same sort of thing with their C++ compilers? Or just don't use the extensions and invoke the compiler flags for "Standard C++" and ignore 'em. -- Mark W. Schumann 3111 Mapledale Avenue, Cleveland 44109 USA Domain: catfood@ncoast.org UUCP: ...!mailrus!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!catfood "A union can't participate in a class hierarchy. It can't