Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!cwi.nl!dik
From: dik@cwi.nl (Dik T. Winter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: NAG Fortran 90 announcement
Message-ID: <3778@charon.cwi.nl>
Date: 28 Jun 91 00:55:49 GMT
References: <1991Jun26.003429.6364@jato.jpl.nasa.gov> <BGLENDEN.91Jun26022131@colobus.cv.nrao.edu> <1991Jun27.205204.21086@uai.com>
Sender: news@cwi.nl
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 12

In article <1991Jun27.205204.21086@uai.com> mrl@uai.com (Mark R. Ludwig) writes:
 >            The people here who've been around Fortran for that whole
 > time think F90 is "not Fortran" any more: it's too radically
 > different.  But then these same people aren't "comfortable" using
 > strings in F77 either...$$

Yes, and ELSE, END IF and so on. The Fortran I write is still Fortran 66.
Lots of GOTO's.  (Although Dijkstra, who came from this institute, has
something against it; I wonder why.)
--
dik t. winter, cwi, amsterdam, nederland
dik@cwi.nl