Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!shenkin
From: shenkin@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Peter S. Shenkin)
Subject: Re: comp.lang.fortran
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.155647.21762@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Organization: Columbia University
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1991 15:56:47 GMT

In article <1991Jun27.125026.14993@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> shenkin@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Peter S. Shenkin) writes:
>
>OK, now for wwhat we're all waiting to hear:  how did the code produced by
>f90chk compare in execution time with that produced by the running the 
>200-line garbage Fortran program through a vanilla Fortran compiler?

Metcalf sent me email saying that he can post to usenet only with difficulty,
but that the garbage code really was just garbage and didn't do anything.

	-P.
************************f*u*cn*rd*ths*u*cn*gt*a*gd*jb**************************
Peter S. Shenkin, Department of Chemistry, Barnard College, New York, NY  10027
(212)854-1418  shenkin@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu(Internet)  shenkin@cunixf(Bitnet)
***"In scenic New York... where the third world is only a subway ride away."***