Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news
From: francis@hanauma.Stanford.EDU (Francis Muir)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: FORTRAN CM
Message-ID: <1991Jun30.235227.10714@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 30 Jun 91 23:52:27 GMT
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: Stanford University, Department of Geophysics
Lines: 6

FORTRAN CM - Thinking Machines' high-level language for the CM2 (front-
ended by a SUN4) - has been described as a supersubset of FORTRAN 90. Is 
this a fair description? Where do these languages significantly diverge? 
The pre-compiler directives, such as CMF$ LAYOUT, are super, what is sub?

							Fido