Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!ccu.umanitoba.ca!herald.usask.ca!alberta!brazeau.ucs.ualberta.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!rice!hsdndev!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!pikes!aspen.craycos.com!jrbd
From: jrbd@craycos.com (James Davies)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: CPSR vs. EFF
Message-ID: <1991Jun28.202810.1594@craycos.com>
Date: 28 Jun 91 20:28:10 GMT
References: <1991Jun26.184003.22787@spool.cs.wisc.edu> <1991Jun27.051845.30495@wpi.WPI.EDU> <1991Jun28.142859.20500@spool.cs.wisc.edu>
Organization: Cray Computer Corporation
Lines: 22

In article <1991Jun28.142859.20500@spool.cs.wisc.edu> samuel@shemp.cs.wisc.edu (Samuel Bates) writes:
>
>	The point is that these deaths, due in large part to computer 
>	technology, benefitted nobody.  Again, other applications of the 
>	technology _can_ benefit people both in this country and in the Middle 
>	East.
> {...}
>	The key word here is "help"; the CPSR are not saying that they can 
>	solve these problems by themselves.  They _are_ saying that computer 
>	technology and expertise have not generally been directed at these 
>	problems, and that it has the potential to _help_ find a solution.

"not generally directed"?  Do you really believe that the majority of
computer technology is being used by the military these days?

I interpreted the CPSR ad as strictly a political statement, on a topic which 
has no relevance to computers.  After all, do you really think that this
war was caused by technology?  I thought it was caused by Iraq's invasion
of Kuwait...

What would you think if a steel industry group (SPSR?) took out an ad decrying
the use of steel in the gulf war?  Would you think that it wasn't political?