Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!cs!cs.umb.edu!ryan From: ryan@ra.cs.umb.edu (Daniel R. Guilderson) Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: Repost from Telecom Message-ID: Date: 29 Jun 91 18:21:07 GMT References: <1991Jun25.005151.27279@looking.on.ca> <1991Jun25.122028.7528@sulaco.Lonestar.ORG> <1991Jun28.000159.2653@sulaco.Lonestar.ORG> Sender: news@cs.umb.edu (netnews) Organization: UMass Boston Dorchester, MA USA Lines: 23 In-Reply-To: allen@sulaco.Lonestar.ORG's message of 28 Jun 91 00:01:59 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: ra.cs.umb.edu In article <1991Jun28.000159.2653@sulaco.Lonestar.ORG> allen@sulaco.Lonestar.ORG (Allen Gwinn) writes: [Stuff deleted] Excellent rant... Thanks I wrote: >Sorry to sound so callous, but you don't have a clue about action and >responsibility. No certainly not. I agree with you. One should be able to break any law in the land, and as long as he/she has support from you, one should be able to walk off scott-free. Sorry for even questioning the issue. First off we are not talking about Len's responsibilities, we are talking about whether or not the Feds were justified in running roughshod all over innocent citizens. You can't seem to understand what the argument is so you keep hammering away at Len. Second, if we want to argue about how much punishment Len is getting for receiving stolen property, just remember that Ollie North has yet to serve a single day in prison. By the way, your not such a bad ranter yourself.