Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!riacs!pioneer.arc.nasa.gov!lamaster From: lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) Newsgroups: comp.org.usenix Subject: Re: Why not pick *nice* places for the Usenix conventions? Message-ID: <1991Jun28.215318.17094@riacs.edu> Date: 28 Jun 91 21:53:18 GMT References: <1991Jun22.192721.11468@ircam.fr> <1991Jun26.011537.23197@bilver.uucp> Sender: news@riacs.edu Reply-To: lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (Hugh LaMaster) Organization: RIACS, NASA Ames Research Center Lines: 23 In article <1991Jun26.011537.23197@bilver.uucp>, bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes: |> In article bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) writes: |> And I beleive it was the latest "login" that said that ALL future |> winter conference after New Orleans will alternate between San |> Diego and S.F. No more miserable snows like Wash or Dallas. SF has been a great place for the *Summer* USENIX, since the weather is *almost* always clear and dry and fairly cool (as I write this, it is raining in the Bay Area). A more southerly location is appropriate for winter. Of course, Summer in SF and Winter in San Diego might be a bit much for the corporate bean counters back east... -- Hugh LaMaster, M/S 233-9, UUCP: ames!lamaster NASA Ames Research Center Internet: lamaster@ames.arc.nasa.gov Moffett Field, CA 94035 With Good Mailer: lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov Phone: 415/604-1056 #include