Xref: utzoo comp.os.misc:1939 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:4895
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!peter
From: peter@Sugar.NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.os.misc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Amiga is better then [sic] what???
Message-ID: <1991Jun29.134743.10364@Sugar.NeoSoft.com>
Date: 29 Jun 91 13:47:43 GMT
References: <1991Jun28.110906.13772@agora.rain.com>
Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX
Lines: 9

In an article Rod.Fulk@f24.n228.z1.FidoNet.Org (Rod Fulk) writes:
> Compare OS's... The St is built with a much more complete OS then ANY of
> the amiga OS's..

I didn't realise Atari had come out with an O/S for the ST. Last time I
looked it just had a program loader and graphics library.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'   <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>.
                   'U`    "Have you hugged your wolf today?"